So saying, GÇ£I want to be safe in high sec and just to be an industrialistGÇ¥ is inherently creating a two tier system, where the PVPers take all the risk and then industrialists get all the rewards. ItGÇÖs unbalanced.

more waffle, butthurt, 0.0 BS and rant

Your lesson is flawed on a very basic level. The assumption it carries within it is that the fighters *aren't* already producing etc., etc.,

We do.

You'd be surprised.

...that does seem rather powerblock friendly though as the only entities which can readily use secure markets without tax penalties are those with some reasonable control of the surrounding space. Lesser entities without secure markets and those needing materials lacking in their respective regions would find themselves potentially at a further disadvantage compared to powerful entities than already is the case.

So, the previous thread you were bitching about how we didn't want to build in nullsec because we were lazy, and now we want to build things in one handy location because we're lazy.

It's almost as if you're taking a look at what the arguments are, and argue the exact opposite.

Touval,

If I want to compete in null, I HAVE to import.

"ban importing from hisec, that will solve all your problems" durr

One should proceed to simpler theories until simplicity can be traded for greater explanatory power. The simplest available theory need not be most accurate.

or the consequences of their CHOICE to play

...a multiplayer game
...where undocking in consenting to get pew pew'd
...playing the game wrong

I mean I have the self control needed not to punch somebody in the face when they make fun of how bad I am at a video game

...direct us all to the threads started by pvpers crying about not wanting to bring risk to high sec.

What in the hell does that even have to do with what I quoted?

Did I miss something? Am I supposed to be rambling off a bunch of unrelated jibberish when I repsond to people?

Should I be responding to you with, well how in the world do you bake a cake without flour?

"because a fat kid likes cake"

...but most people in null don't want to nerf the hell out of high sec
...we just don't want to be disadvantaged because we choose to play in the part of the game that is entirely player driven.

"because mittens told us to"
Obvously not because we play in null and therefore KNOW.

stuff about can't make enough money selling **** in null

also i love it when hiseccers think that removing local will make nullsec more favorable to small alliances

Nah, you misunderstand Herzog, I want there to be stuff to gank for when I go on roams, not some sort of even emptier wasteland. Hence why your illogical, emotionally fuelled argument for no-local 0.0 isn't passing muster.

I'm not here to charm anyone, this isn't a popularity contest.

I was translating Herzog's post. With one breath he goes "you can't touch hisec", with the next he goes "but here's how we can make nullsec a ***** to live in".

That doesn't mean we have to accept the badly made, disingenuous arguments of some buttmad highsec carebear who starts making dumbass taunts whenever its calmly explained to him why his "idea" is bad.

For now anyway. After highsec gets buffed enough, it'll not be the case.

But rejoice, your L4s and belts of rocks will still be ready to accept you when you finally give in to CCP's vision of:

Highsec Online

Get it now Touval?